See It in Action
In the construction industry, managing relationships with key stakeholders is essential for the success of any project. Keeping stakeholders engaged and informed, from clients and investors to suppliers and subcontractors, can make or break a project.
While many companies rely on Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems to streamline communication and centralize data, using CRMs for stakeholder management has benefits and limitations.
CRMs allow construction firms to organize stakeholder information, automate communication, and track engagement, helping teams stay aligned and proactive.
However, CRMs often fail to address the unique needs of non-customer stakeholders, such as prioritization, feedback analysis, and compliance.
In this article, we’ll explore how CRMs can improve stakeholder management, where they may fall short, and whether Stakeholder Relationship Management (SRM) systems may offer a better solution for managing complex stakeholder interactions.
Managing relationships with key stakeholders requires a consistent, organized approach.
CRM systems are essential tools for construction firms to centralize all stakeholder information, ensuring that everyone involved in the project can access accurate and up-to-date details.
This helps firms improve communication, align teams, and ensure that stakeholders are informed at every project stage.
CRM systems allow construction companies to store all stakeholder-related data in one place.
A centralized database ensures team members can easily access and update information, from contact details and communication logs to project-specific notes. This reduces the risk of miscommunication or missed opportunities and helps teams stay aligned.
This transparency and consistency, vital in complex construction projects, benefit stakeholders such as clients, suppliers, and subcontractors.
One critical feature of CRM systems is their ability to enhance collaboration between internal teams and external stakeholders.
CRMs log all project-related communications, making it easier for different departments to stay informed. This improved collaboration is particularly beneficial in construction, where projects often involve multiple parties working toward the same goal.
CRM systems centralize all updates and correspondence, helping prevent delays and miscommunication and facilitating smoother project execution.
CRM systems automate many aspects of stakeholder engagement, such as scheduling follow-ups, sending reminders, and automating status updates.
This automation ensures that stakeholders receive timely communication without manual intervention from team members, allowing the firm to maintain consistent engagement.
Automated workflows also help avoid human error, ensuring no important communication or task is overlooked.
For instance, automated follow-ups ensure that important milestones, updates, or meetings with stakeholders happen on schedule, fostering trust and keeping projects on track.
While CRM systems offer valuable tools for managing relationships with key stakeholders, they also present certain challenges when used in stakeholder management.
These limitations can affect user adoption, feedback analysis, and stakeholder prioritization, critical aspects of maintaining effective engagement with non-customer stakeholders.
One of the significant challenges construction firms face when using CRM systems for stakeholder management is low user adoption rates.
CRMs are traditionally designed for managing customer relationships, which means that many of their features are focused on sales rather than the diverse needs of stakeholders.
Studies show that CRM implementation projects can fail as high as 69%, particularly when the system is customized for purposes other than sales. This can lead to gaps in data and inconsistent use, making it difficult to maintain accurate stakeholder information.
The result is that teams may not fully leverage the CRM system’s capabilities, reducing its effectiveness in stakeholder engagement.
While CRMs provide some tools for gathering and analyzing feedback, they are often limited in their ability to engage stakeholders.
For example, CRMs are generally not equipped to handle the complex feedback analysis required for managing relationships with multiple types of stakeholders, such as regulatory bodies, suppliers, or community groups.
As a result, construction firms using CRMs may struggle to gain meaningful insights from stakeholder feedback, which hampers their ability to adapt strategies based on stakeholder needs.
This gap in functionality can limit the firm’s ability to build stronger, more responsive relationships with stakeholders.
CRMs are built around customer relationship metrics, prioritizing leads and clients based on financial potential.
However, stakeholder management often requires a different approach. In this approach, stakeholders need to be prioritized based on influence, interest, or regulatory importance rather than financial metrics.
This challenges construction firms using CRM systems to engage with key stakeholders who don’t directly impact revenue but are critical to the project’s success.
CRMs lack the flexibility to prioritize and manage non-customer stakeholders effectively, making it harder for teams to focus on the most important stakeholder relationships.
One of CRM systems' key strengths is their ability to collect and analyze large volumes of data, providing valuable insights into stakeholder relationships.
By leveraging this data, construction firms can make more informed decisions about engaging with stakeholders, improve communication strategies, and anticipate needs before issues arise.
CRM systems offer robust tracking capabilities that allow construction firms to log every interaction with stakeholders, from meetings and emails to project updates and requests. This data provides a clear history of engagement, helping teams understand how often and in what context they interact with key stakeholders.
Firms can use this data to track trends in stakeholder sentiment over time, allowing them to identify areas where relationships may need strengthening.
Approximately 70% of companies report improved decision-making capabilities when leveraging CRM systems for data-driven insights, allowing them to stay proactive in managing stakeholder concerns.
CRMs provide valuable analytics that construction firms can use to analyze stakeholder behavior and engagement patterns. These insights enable firms to adjust their strategies and tailor their communications based on stakeholder preferences.
For example, suppose a key stakeholder shows a decline in engagement. In that case, the CRM system can alert the team to take corrective action, such as scheduling a meeting or sending a personalized update.
Firms can use CRM analytics to improve their overall stakeholder management strategies, address concerns, and maintain positive relationships.
Using CRM data, construction firms can identify patterns and trends in stakeholder interactions that help anticipate future needs.
For example, if certain stakeholders frequently raise specific concerns or requests, the CRM system can highlight these patterns, allowing the firm to address these issues proactively. This helps prevent potential project delays and enhances the firm’s reputation for responsiveness and attention to stakeholder concerns.
Data-driven insights also allow firms to tailor their communication and engagement strategies to meet the unique needs of each stakeholder group.
Managing compliance and maintaining accurate records in the construction industry is crucial, especially when dealing with various stakeholders such as regulatory bodies, investors, and community groups.
CRM systems can help streamline compliance-related tasks by centralizing data and automating recordkeeping processes.
However, CRMs also have limitations in fully supporting the comprehensive compliance needs of stakeholder management.
While CRM systems offer basic compliance functionalities, they often fall short when handling the complexities of compliance specific to stakeholder management. Construction projects frequently involve legal and regulatory obligations that require detailed tracking and reporting of stakeholder interactions.
CRMs, typically designed for customer management, may lack the robust features needed for managing these interactions compliantly.
For instance, firms using CRM systems may still need to supplement their processes with additional tools to handle regulatory audits or legal recordkeeping, which can introduce inefficiencies.
Accurate recordkeeping is vital for ensuring compliance with industry regulations, particularly when projects involve multiple stakeholders with varying legal and contractual obligations.
CRM systems can simplify recordkeeping by automatically storing all communications, meeting notes, and project updates in one central location. This centralization makes it easier for teams to find necessary information quickly and ensures that the firm has a clear and auditable trail of stakeholder interactions.
Firms that use CRM systems for recordkeeping report up to a 40% reduction in the time spent searching for project and compliance documents.
For firms that must comply with specific regulatory requirements or are subject to frequent audits, having all stakeholder interactions logged and easily accessible is essential. CRMs can help streamline this process by ensuring every stakeholder interaction is recorded in real-time and stored securely.
However, some firms find that CRM systems must be customized to meet specific audit requirements, such as tracking environmental regulations or community impact commitments, which can be resource-intensive.
CRM systems designed primarily for sales may need additional integration or customization to fully meet the compliance needs of construction firms managing diverse stakeholder groups.
While CRM systems offer valuable tools for managing relationships with clients and customers, they often fall short when managing stakeholders' diverse and complex needs in the construction industry. This is where Stakeholder Relationship Management (SRM) systems come into play.
SRM systems are designed to handle stakeholder engagement, offering features tailored to meet the demands of managing non-customer relationships such as community groups, regulatory bodies, suppliers, and other key parties involved in a construction project.
Although CRM and SRM systems share some common functionalities—such as tracking interactions and centralizing communication—SRM platforms are specifically built to manage stakeholders who may not directly impact the bottom line but are critical to a project's success.
CRMs typically focus on customer acquisition and sales metrics, whereas SRM systems prioritize engagement, sentiment tracking, and the influence of various stakeholders.
This distinction is important for construction firms managing many stakeholder relationships beyond clients.
SRM systems also offer more advanced features for mapping stakeholder influence and interest, helping firms prioritize engagement with those who have the most impact on a project.
Firms using SRM systems report better outcomes when managing stakeholder relationships than those using traditional CRMs because the system is tailored to the nuances of non-financial stakeholder management.
SRM systems come with a set of tools that are more focused on stakeholder management's specific needs. These include sentiment analysis, stakeholder prioritization tools, and specialized reporting features that provide a more comprehensive view of how each stakeholder affects the project.
For example, SRM systems can monitor the sentiment of community stakeholders or regulatory authorities, giving firms insights into how their decisions and communications are being received.
In addition, SRM systems often include features that allow firms to map stakeholder networks, understanding how different groups are connected and how those relationships might impact the project.
This is particularly useful in the construction industry, where projects often have wide-reaching impacts on communities, governments, and environmental groups.
Construction firms that use SRM systems can benefit from more effective stakeholder management strategies. These systems provide the tools needed to engage stakeholders early, often ensuring that issues are addressed before they escalate into larger problems.
Additionally, SRM systems offer better tracking and reporting capabilities for managing legal obligations, such as environmental regulations or community engagement requirements, often not fully supported by CRM platforms.
Managing relationships with key stakeholders in the construction industry requires a strategic and organized approach.
With ProjectMark CRM, your construction firm can streamline stakeholder management and ensure that you maintain strong, positive relationships with all parties involved in your projects. From automating follow-ups to centralizing key data and insights, ProjectMark offers the tools to stay proactive and engaged with your stakeholders.
Ready to take your stakeholder management to the next level? Get a demo and see how ProjectMark can help your construction business succeed.
